St Paul's Bay
San Pawl il-Baħar · Malta · Traffic · Urban
What's affecting the air?(3)
Conditions across the Maltese Islands that may be influencing air quality. Context explains a reading; it never adjusts one, and it does not establish the cause of any individual measurement.
Saharan dust forecast
The CAMS model forecasts mineral dust concentrations peaking near 32 µg/m³ over the Maltese Islands, with an aerosol optical depth of about 0.26. Dust transported from North Africa may contribute to elevated PM10 and, to a lesser extent, PM2.5. Dust is a natural source, but the particles it adds affect health in much the same way as other coarse particulate matter.
May worsen air quality
ForecastModerate confidenceMaltese IslandsMost relevant to: PM10, PM2.5
–
Light winds and limited dispersion
Wind speeds are forecast to fall to about 4.1 km/h for around 13 hours. Light winds may allow locally emitted pollutants — traffic nitrogen dioxide and fine particles in particular — to accumulate near the ground instead of dispersing.
May worsen air quality
ForecastModerate confidenceMaltese IslandsMost relevant to: NO₂, PM2.5, PM10
–
Source:Open-Meteo weather forecast (ECMWF and DWD models) (Opens in a new window)Retrieved at
Shallow mixing layer — possible temperature inversion
The forecast mixing layer drops to about 225 m with warmer air above it. That pattern is the signature of a temperature inversion, which may trap pollutants close to the ground overnight and into the early morning. This is a model-based indication rather than a measured inversion.
May worsen air quality
ForecastLower confidenceMaltese IslandsMost relevant to: NO₂, PM2.5, PM10
–
Source:Open-Meteo weather forecast (ECMWF and DWD models) (Opens in a new window)Retrieved at
Air quality now
Air quality is fair. Outdoor activities are fine for most people.
Concentrations are a little above the lowest band but remain well within everyday levels.
Leading pollutant: NO₂The pollutant with the highest sub-index at this hour. The overall band is the worst sub-index across the pollutants this station reported.
Delayed2 hours oldMeasured at Retrieved atNext reading expected around Wed 7 Oct 2026, 15:58
Near-real-time readings are provisional. ERA validates data after publication, and figures may be revised.
Pollutants measured
Measured at Wed 7 Oct 2026, 13:00
PM2.5, fine particulate matter
11 µg/m³
PM2.5, fine particulate matter: Fair2.6Averaging period: Hourly
What is PM2.5, fine particulate matter?PM10, coarse particulate matter
27 µg/m³
PM10, coarse particulate matter: Fair2.4Averaging period: Hourly
What is PM10, coarse particulate matter?Nitrogen dioxide
Leading pollutant22 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide: Fair2.8Averaging period: Hourly
What is Nitrogen dioxide?Ozone
66 µg/m³
Ozone: Fair2.1Averaging period: Hourly
What is Ozone?Sulphur dioxide
0.7 µg/m³
Sulphur dioxide: Good1.0Averaging period: Hourly
What is Sulphur dioxide?
Trends and recent history
Hourly values as published, including hours the feed filled in by modelling.
The published feed carries roughly ten days of hourly history and about two days of forecast, so no longer window is offered. Hours the instrument did not report are shown as gaps. This view covers 68 hours from Tue 6 Oct 2026, 17:00 to Fri 9 Oct 2026, 12:00.
Concentration (µg/m³)
Time (Malta)
- Measured
- Estimated
- Forecast
- Everything to the right of this line is forecast.
- Good 0–10 µg/m³
- Fair 10–25 µg/m³
- Moderate 25–60 µg/m³
- Poor 60–100 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide at St Paul's Bay, hourly, in µg/m³, covering the last 24 hours. The published points run from Tue 6 Oct 2026, 17:00 to Fri 9 Oct 2026, 12:00. 68 hours are shown: 19 measured, 2 filled in by modelling, 47 forecast, and 0 with no value at all. Measured values ran from 7.5 µg/m³ at Wed 7 Oct 2026, 01:00 to 69 µg/m³ at Wed 7 Oct 2026, 08:00, averaging 33 µg/m³ across the 19 measured hours.
Show the values as a table
| Time (Malta) | Value | Band | How the value was obtained |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 µg/m³ | Fair | Measured | |
| 35 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 35 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 46 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 48 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 46 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 30 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 19 µg/m³ | Fair | Measured | |
| 7.5 µg/m³ | Good | Measured | |
| 11 µg/m³ | Fair | Measured | |
| 3.0 µg/m³ | Good | Estimated | |
| 4.0 µg/m³ | Good | Estimated | |
| 18 µg/m³ | Fair | Measured | |
| 40 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 62 µg/m³ | Poor | Measured | |
| 69 µg/m³ | Poor | Measured | |
| 39 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 30 µg/m³ | Moderate | Measured | |
| 22 µg/m³ | Fair | Measured | |
| 22 µg/m³ | Fair | Measured | |
| 22 µg/m³ | Fair | Measured | |
| 8.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 11 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 12 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 12 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 11 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 8.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 8.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 8.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 14 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 18 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 21 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 18 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 13 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 12 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 16 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 16 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 15 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 13 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 11 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 11 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 9.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 6.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 5.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 5.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 5.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 8.0 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 11 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 14 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 19 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 16 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 12 µg/m³ | Fair | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast | |
| 10 µg/m³ | Good | Forecast |
- Lowest measured
- 7.5 µg/m³
- Average of measured hours
- 33 µg/m³
- Highest measured
- 69 µg/m³
- Hours with a measured value
- 19 of 68
Figures cover directly measured hours only. Modelled and forecast hours are excluded from the minimum, maximum and average. Near-real-time data is published before validation and may be revised or withdrawn by ERA.
Some past hours are modelled too: the feed fills gaps when an instrument does not report. Those points are marked as estimated. All times are shown in Malta time.
How this compares
NO₂ — 22 µg/m³
Below the EU limit value of 200 µg/m³
200 µg/m³ over 1 hour · Reference: Directive 2008/50/EC Annex XI
Below the EU limit value of 40 µg/m³
40 µg/m³ over Calendar year · Reference: Directive 2008/50/EC Annex XI
Below the WHO guideline of 25 µg/m³
25 µg/m³ over 24 hours · Reference: WHO 2021
Above the WHO guideline of 10 µg/m³
10 µg/m³ over Annual · Reference: WHO 2021
This limit applies to an average over a calendar year, so a single hourly reading cannot show whether it has been breached.
EU limit values describe legal compliance over long averaging periods. The index bands above are for communication and are a different thing entirely. WHO guidelines are health-based guidance, not law.
What this means for you
Advice for the current band: Fair
For most people
Outdoor activity remains fine for the general population.
If you are more sensitive
A small number of unusually sensitive people may notice mild symptoms during long outdoor exertion.
Who is more affected, and why
- Children
- Children breathe more air for their size and spend more time active outdoors, so they take in relatively more of whatever is in the air.
- Older adults
- Existing heart or lung conditions become more common with age, and these are what air pollution tends to aggravate.
- People who are pregnant
- Reducing avoidable exposure during raised episodes is a reasonable precaution.
- People with asthma
- Raised particles, nitrogen dioxide and ozone can all trigger symptoms. Keep reliever medication to hand on poor-air days.
- People with lung conditions
- COPD, bronchitis and similar conditions can flare when levels rise. Plan outdoor activity for cleaner hours where possible.
- People with heart conditions
- Fine particles are the pollutant most closely linked with cardiovascular effects during raised episodes.
- People who work outdoors
- Long shifts outdoors mean higher cumulative exposure than a short trip. Take breaks indoors when levels are raised.
- People exercising hard outdoors
- Hard exercise draws more air deeper into the lungs and often through the mouth, bypassing the nose. Consider rescheduling intense sessions when levels are raised.
Advice here is general and precautionary. Air quality is one factor among many, and staying active remains beneficial. If you have severe or sudden symptoms, seek medical help rather than relying on this page.
maqua.app provides general environmental information and does not replace medical advice or official emergency guidance.
Estimated air-quality outlook
EstimatedForecast values are model output, not measurements. Modelled estimates from the Copernicus atmosphere service, carried in the same feed.
- Prepared at
- Based on measurements up to
- Published outlook
- Wed 7 Oct 2026, 14:00 to Fri 9 Oct 2026, 12:00 (47 hours)
Moderate confidence
- Looks 22 hours ahead, where the official model becomes less certain.
Highest band expected Wed 7 Oct 2026, 14:00 Highest expected band: Fair2.8
- Highest band estimated for this day: Fair
Estimated · Higher confidence · 10 forecast hours
Driven by O₃
- Highest band estimated for this day: Fair
Estimated · Moderate confidence · 24 forecast hours
Driven by O₃
- Highest band estimated for this day: Fair
Estimated · Lower confidence · 13 forecast hours
Driven by O₃
Why the outlook looks like this
Saharan dust forecast over the islands
Mineral dust is forecast over the Maltese Islands, peaking near 32 µg/m³. Dust transported from North Africa may contribute to particulate levels, particularly PM10.
May push levels upModerate confidence –
Source:Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS), via Open-Meteo (Opens in a new window)Ozone building in warm, sunny conditions
The official forecast has ozone averaging about 82 µg/m³ over the coming day, against about 55 µg/m³ in recent measurements, with temperatures reaching around 29 °C. Ozone forms in sunlight rather than being emitted directly, so warm, bright and lightly ventilated conditions are likely to favour higher afternoon levels.
May push levels upModerate confidence –
Source:Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS), disseminated by the European Environment Agency (EEA) (Opens in a new window)Light winds may limit dispersion
Winds are forecast to average about 8 km/h. Light winds may allow locally emitted pollutants to linger rather than disperse, particularly overnight and near busy roads.
May push levels upModerate confidence –
Source:Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS), disseminated by the European Environment Agency (EEA) (Opens in a new window)PM2.5 forecast to ease
The official forecast has PM2.5 averaging about 8 µg/m³ over the coming day, against about 12 µg/m³ in recent measurements.
May bring levels downModerate confidence –
Source:Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS), disseminated by the European Environment Agency (EEA) (Opens in a new window)
What this outlook cannot tell you
- These are modelled values for St Paul's Bay, not measurements, and may differ from what is later recorded there.
- The model describes regional conditions. It cannot anticipate a local event such as roadworks, a fire or a fireworks display.
- Confidence falls the further ahead the outlook reaches.
- No forecast is published for SO₂ at this station, although the station measures it.
Modelled hourly concentrations from the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service, published alongside the measurements in the EEA European Air Quality Index dissemination layer and classified with the same European AQI bands maqua.app applies to observations. maqua.app does not model air quality and does not adjust these values.
- Source:Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS), disseminated by the European Environment Agency (EEA) (Opens in a new window)(Copernicus and EEA open data)
maqua.app provides general environmental information and does not replace medical advice or official emergency guidance.
Explain this reading
Explanations are general information, not medical advice. Every number on this page is calculated by the application itself and is unaffected.
No explanation has been requested. Activate the button to prepare one.
Where this reading comes from
Air-quality data provided by Malta's Environment and Resources Authority (ERA), disseminated via the European Environment Agency (EEA). maqua.app is an independent project and is not operated by, affiliated with, or endorsed by ERA or the EEA.
Each pollutant concentration is rounded to the nearest whole microgram per cubic metre and matched against the published band ranges. The location takes the band of its worst pollutant. A missing value is shown as unavailable and never as zero. Bands are calculated only from pollutants that actually reported.
This is not an official ERA or EEA service. For official statements, consult ERA directly.
Station detail
- Station type
- TrafficSited beside a busy road, so it records the higher end of local exposure.
- Area
- Urban
- Island
- Malta
- Altitude
- 7 m above sea level
- Coordinates
- 35.9448° N, 14.3857° E
- Operated by
- Environment & Resources Authority (ERA)
Station code: MT00009
All times are shown in Malta time.
About this station
The network’s second Traffic station, and the only roadside site that reports all five pollutants — the most complete picture of kerbside air on the islands.
St Paul’s Bay is the other Traffic site in an Urban area, so like Msida it is sited for exposure rather than for representativeness. Having two Traffic stations rather than one matters more than it sounds: a single roadside monitor cannot be distinguished from a local peculiarity, while two in different parts of Malta can be compared.
It sits 7 metres above sea level. That is close to Msida’s 2 metres and far below Attard’s 86, so the two Traffic sites are also the two lowest — which is worth knowing when comparing them against the Background stations, since siting classification and elevation are not independent in this network.
Three of the five stations report every one of the index pollutants, and this is the only Traffic site among them — Għarb and Żejtun are the other two, and both are Background. So for a kerbside question this is the one station where the index is never set by default because a pollutant was not measured.
The daily pattern here, measured
Worked out from this station's own measured hours — forecasts and gap-filled estimates are excluded, so this describes what the instruments actually recorded. The upstream feed carries roughly ten days of history, so this is the shape of a short recent sample rather than a seasonal average.
PM2.5 is typically highest around 09:00 (13.0 µg/m³ on average) and lowest around 05:00 (7.6 µg/m³) — a moderate daily cycle, with the peak running 1.7× the trough. (257 measured hours over 11 days)
PM10 is typically highest around 09:00 (35.8 µg/m³ on average) and lowest around 05:00 (13.3 µg/m³) — a pronounced daily cycle, with the peak running 2.7× the trough. (257 measured hours over 11 days)
NO₂ is typically highest around 20:00 (55.2 µg/m³ on average) and lowest around 15:00 (20.0 µg/m³) — a pronounced daily cycle, with the peak running 2.8× the trough. (233 measured hours over 11 days)
O₃ is typically highest around 14:00 (78.9 µg/m³ on average) and lowest around 06:00 (29.3 µg/m³) — a pronounced daily cycle, with the peak running 2.7× the trough. (249 measured hours over 11 days)
SO₂ stays very low here throughout the day, averaging 1.1 µg/m³ — far below the top of its Good band. At these levels the hour-to-hour differences are within the range of instrument noise, so no daily pattern is claimed from them. (243 measured hours over 11 days)
What this station answers best
A roadside reading that can be compared against another roadside reading, and the only kerbside site where all five pollutants are available at once.
What it cannot tell you
- As a Traffic site it describes kerbside exposure, not the general air of the area. The Background stations answer that question.
- A complete set of pollutants is not the same as a complete picture of Malta: this is still one monitor at one coordinate.
Near-real-time readings are provisional. ERA validates data after publication, and figures may be revised.